Page One
Thursday, May 4th, 2006Growing Without Schooling #77 - Vol. 13, No. 5.
Date of Issue: October 1, 1990
Questioning College: Interview with Herbert Kohl
“You’d have to go to school for that,” people say, about experiences or opportunities that it’s hard to imagine homeschoolers having access to. “What about biology labs? What about team sports?” Sometimes these questions are posed as challenges from a critic of homeschooling, someone who wants to point out that at least some things are surely impossible for homeschooling parents to provide. Just as often, though, these questions come from homeschoolers who are feeling stuck about a particular issue. Maybe they’ve been homeschooling successfully for a while, but they’ve come up against a problem: their child wants to play a team sport, or have access to school’s social life, or whatever it may be. If we take that interest seriously, the family wonders, will school be the only way to satisfy it?
This is the kind of challenge that we at Growing Without Schooling like to meet. If someone says it can’t be done without going to school, we start thinking of, and looking around for, ways that whatever it is can be done. For this issue of GWS, we’ve interviewed homeschoolers (both parents and children) who have found a way to get or provide the experience in question without having to give up homeschooling. We’re hoping that their experiences, and even more important their ways of thinking about such questions, will help others who may be feeling stuck.
These homeschoolers have in common what they refused to believe: that they had to accept the whole of the school experience in order to have access to a part of it, and that what they wanted could be found only in school. Jesse Schwerin and Kevin Davies didn’t believe they had to enroll in school full time just to get the parts of it (running on the track team and riding the school bus) that they wanted. Susan Shilcock didn’t believe that enrolling her child in high school, or even enrolling her in one class, was the only way to give her access to biology labs and equipment. When this refusal is combined with a willingness to think creatively about what else might be done, it becomes relatively easy for parents and children to find alternate solutions.
Often, families find that focusing on the specific activity or experience that they are looking for, as opposed to thinking that school must be the answer, brings results that are closer to what they really wanted in the first place. After all, if what you want is to run on the track team, do you need to go to classes, take tests, and all the rest of it, just to get that one activity? If what you want is the chance to use lab equipment, is school the only place where that can be done?
John Holt wrote to a group of students in 1970, “…We have to push out against the walls of circumstances that hem us in. One of the reasons we have to push is that unless we push we can’t really be sure where the walls are. We may find that we are walled in, not so much by a real wall as by a wall that we have built in our imagination…” John was writing to people who thought they had to go to school to get a good job. The same is true of people who think they have to go to school to get biology equipment or sports teams. It may be true in a particular situation, but it may not. It has certainly not been true for everyone. The only thing to do is to test those walls, see how far they expand, find out for sure what can’t be done and what and what is, in fact, very possible. – Susannah Sheffer
OFFICE NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS
[SS:] “Back-to-school” season has brought us more calls than usual from reporters wanting to do stories on the children who are not going back to school. In the past few weeks we’ve spoken to writers from Time, The Nation, The Boston Globe, Harpers, Parenting, and New York Newsday. An article in the Utne Reader, which listed us as a resource, has brought in many inquiries, too.
Some of you may have expected to see our fall John Holt’s Book and Music Store catalog bound into this issue of GWS. At the last minute, we learned that postal regulations now prevent us from binding a third-class piece of mail in with a second-class piece, so we are mailing the catalog to subscribers separately. This issue of GWS is only 24 pages because we expected the catalog to be included in it.
In the catalog you’ll see Nancy Wallace’s new book, Child’s Work, which we have published here at Holt Associates, and A Life Worth Living: Selected Letters of John Holt. You can help us by asking your local bookstores to order these books, and by reviewing them for newspapers or magazines. We’ve also put together a collection of John Holt’s book reviews (from GWS and elsewhere) called Sharing Treasures.
One note about the availability of A Life Worth Living: just as we were going to press, we learned that there had been a delay at the publishers of about four weeks, so that instead of having the book here in late October, as we had anticipated, we will have it in late November or early December. We encourage those of you who want a copy of the book to order it as soon as you get the catalog. We will maintain a list of requests for the book, in the order we receive them, and will fill them as soon as the shipment of books arrives. If you order by credit card, we won’t charge you until the order is shipped. We especially encourage you to order early if you’re hoping to have the book by Christmas.
We would like to hear from people - adults or children - who enjoy math, and are perhaps doing it in interesting or unusual ways (other than just out of textbooks, in other words, although if you are enjoying that, tell us about it too). We would also like to hear from or about young people who are doing science with real, working scientists - in the lab, in the field, etc.
NEWS & REPORTS
New Law in New Hampshire
Just after GWS #76 went to press in July, we received a copy of New Hampshire’s new homeschooling law (previously called Senate Bill 373). According to a mailing from the NEW HAMPSHIRE HOME EDUCATORS ASSOCIATION, two parts of the law went into effect as of July 1990:
(1) the compulsory attendance law now includes home education as one of the exceptions to the public school attendance requirement, and
(2) a Home Education Advisory Council was established, appointed by the commissioner of education. The council will have six members nominated by New Hampshire homeschooling organizations, two representatives from the State Department of Education, and a representative from each of the following: the School Board Association, the Principals Association, the School Administrators Association, the Nonpublic School Advisory council.
The rest of the bill, which will go into effect in July 1991, includes the following provisions:
1. Parents notify, by August 1 of each year, the commissioner of education, resident district superintendent, or principal of a nonpublic school, of their intent to homeschool. The notification must include a list of subjects to be taught, name of correspondence school used, if any, name of curriculum provider used, if any, an outline of “the scope of instructional sequence for each subject,” and a list of textbooks “or other instructional materials used.”
2. The State Board of Education is given authority to adopt rules for administering home education programs (more about this below).
3. Parents must maintain a portfolio of records and materials pertaining to the program for at least two years from the date ending instruction.
4. Parents have a choice of evaluation methods: a written evaluation by a certified teacher who has reviewed the child’s portfolio and met with the parent or child; a national student achievement test (composite results must be at or above the 40th percentile); a state student assessment test (ditto); or “any other valid measurement tool” mutually agreed upon by the parent and whoever is overseeing the education (local public school, private approved school, or commissioner of the State Dept. of Education).,
5. If the evaluation does not show educational progress “commensurate with (the child’s) age and ability,” the parents are allowed a probationary year of remedial work. If after another evaluation at the end of that year the child has still not shown progress, the commissioner must notify the parents that they are entitled to a hearing and due process procedure. The hearing officer can order that the home education program be terminated if educational progress is deemed insufficient, if the parent doesn’t comply with the statute requirements, or if the parent fails to provide the minimum course of study as required by the law. The hearing officer can also allow the home education program to continue if the parents are found to be in compliance with the law after all.
The New Hampshire Home Educators Association comments in its letter: “During the next year, the State Department of Education will be working on rules and regulations for administration of the statute. We as homeschoolers hope to hold these at a minimum level, but we believe that there will be pressure by educators to restrict and define the law as much as possible. In addition, we believe that challenges to this law, even though it doesn’t go into effect fully until July 1991, will be issued during the 1991 legislative session. Therefore, although we believe that this statute represents good homeschooling legislation, we know that we must continue to be part of the process so that additional requirements and restrictions do not become burdensome.”
How many in MT and ND?
Whenever we receive them, we print reports of how many homeschoolers are in a particular state. The 1990-91 reference guide of The Grapevine, a Montana homeschool newsletter, says: “The Office of Public Instruction reported (that) 564 home schools notified county superintendents in 1987-88 and 725 in 1989-90 in Montana.”
And the August 1990 issue of the North Dakota Home School Association newsletter reports that an official in the state’s Department of Public Instruction told the NDHSA that “he estimates there will be 600 homeschooled children [in North Dakota] in the upcoming school year.”
Do any other states have such figures to report?
State News
Arkansas: The July issue of Update, the newsletter of the ARKANSAS CHRISTIAN HOME EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, mentioned that homeschoolers had requested a meeting with the state Department of Education to discuss streamlining the state’s annual testing of homeschoolers. We spoke with Tom Holiman of ACHEA and learned that this meeting did take place in August, and that one result was the formation of an ongoing task force, made up of both homeschoolers and Department of Education members, to meet once a month and monitor the state’s testing situation and procedures. According to Tom, homeschoolers had complained that staffing problems within the Department had made test administration during the past couple of years unnecessarily chaotic.
Maine: A new law which protests the privacy of homeschooling families’ records became effective on July 14, 1990, according to the July/August issue of the ReMAINEing At Home newsletter. The law is an addition to the previously existing law, as follows: “The United States Family Education Rights and Privacy act of 1974…governs the dissemination of information about students, as well as applications for equivalent instruction through home instruction, comments on the completeness of those applications and all educational records of a student receiving equivalent instruction through home instruction.” (The underline part was added this year.)
South Dakota: The August newsletter of the SOUTH DAKOTA HOME SCHOOL ASSOCIATION discusses the state’s new regulations: (1) Homeschoolers will now be able to take achievement tests at home; (2) The state is attempting to delegate the responsibility for home visits to local school districts; and (3) The state continues to hold minimum time requirements for homeschoolers, despite homeschoolers’ objections.
SDHSA comments about the homeschooling climate in the state in general: “Our relationship with the state department of education appears to be the best it has ever been. I (the president of SDHSA) and other state leaders met with the department earlier in the summer. We were received in a spirit of cooperation as they believe that most homeschoolers are doing a good job.”
Tennessee: In GWS #76 we wrote that homeschoolers had filed suit against state Commissioner of Education Charles E. Smith, charging that his policy of denying their requests for waivers of the BA degree requirement (for parents teaching grades 9-12) was unconstitutional. The judge ruled against the families on that issue.
In the September newsletter of TENNESSEE HOMESCHOOLING FAMILIES, Sandy Madsen adds that also at issue in this case (officially called Crites v. Smith) was the August 1st deadline for annual registration of home schools. Up to now, families who have failed to register by this date have been denied permission to homeschool.
The case involved the Crites family, who moved to Tennessee from Texas (where they had been homeschooling legally) on August 9, 1989. They immediately filed a letter of intent but were denied the right to homeschool because they had registered too late.
Prior to filing the recent lawsuit, Commissioner Smith was advised by his lawyer to issue a memo to all superintendents saying that the August 1 deadline no longer applies to homeschooling parents from out of state who plan to move to Tennessee after the deadline for that year, so that is where things stand now. Homeschoolers who move from one district to another during the school year and those who decide to homeschool after August 1 must enroll their children in school or homeschool illegally.
Speaking to Estonian Teachers
Merike Tamm of South Carolina wrote us about her recent trip to Estonia:
This was my first trip to Estonia, my parents’ homeland. It was wonderful to meet and stay with many relatives and to attend the largest song festival in the world, held every five years, with 30,000 singers.
It was also tremendously exciting to participate in the Estonian Teacher Conference, which included about twenty-five foreigners of Estonian origin from around the world and more than a hundred native Estonians. The conference was organized at this time to take advantage of the fact that so many “outside Estonians” (as we’re called) were coming to Estonia for the Song Festival. Estonian teachers, who have lived in a closed, communist society for fifty years, were hungry for any information from Western countries, and invited us to speak on any topic connected with education.
My forty-minute address on “Homeschooling Throughout the World” (given in Estonian) was scheduled first among the outsiders. I answered many questions immediately afterwards and was told by many that it was the most popular talk. I also led a two-and-a-half hour discussion session on homeschooling the next day, which was supposed to be a small group discussion, but about one hundred teachers showed up. I was exhausted and excited by the experience.
Homeschooling is not a new idea to Estonians. In fact, I was probably drawn to teach my children at home in the U.S. because I had heard many times that Estonian mothers a century ago often taught their children to read at home before sending them to school at age 8 or 9 or 10. Estonians are the strongest individuals I know, with the strongest passion for education. They are also traditionally rural people and are uncomfortable with large institutions. So homeschooling suits the Estonian people well, and they know it.
Homeschooling in Estonia has a long history, but very few chose it during the recent decades of communist rule. Everyone was astounded to hear of its recent growth in many countries. Estonian teachers seemed much more comfortable with the idea of homeschooling and of helping homeschooling parents than American teachers do. In fact, the national Department of Education wants to help parents who choose homeschooling by publishing special materials for them. I am trying to help with this, by sending some samples of homeschooling teachers’ guides, materials catalogs, etc.
I’m sure Estonians would be interested in John Holt’s books, but right now their economic situation makes it impossible for them to undertake translating and publishing them. Maybe in a few years. Many people do know English, however, so I plan to send English-language copies of John Holt’s books to some people I met at the conference.
Organizing Homeschoolers’ Dance
A reader asked us to find out more about the homeschoolers’ dance that was advertised in GWS #74, so we asked Jenny Rodriguez, the Massachusetts teenager who had organized the dance, to tell us about what she’d done:
I wanted to organize some kind of event for homeschoolers. I like to dance, so I decided to organize a dance. I wanted it to be for the whole family, not just for teenagers, so it could be supervised, and so parents could have fun too.
The first thing I had to do was find a hall to hold it in. A friend of mine had had a dance the year before, so I asked her what hall she’d used. It was at a church in Melrose, Massachusetts, so I called them and they told me I had to write them a letter telling them what I wanted to do. I wrote the letter, they approved of it, and I had to give them a small donation.
I advertised the dance in GWS and in our state homeschooling newsletter. I didn’t get a very big response to the ads, but I invited my homeschooling friends, and a few others came, so there ended up being about ten families at the dance.
The day before the dance I decorated the hall, and went to a warehouse to buy some drinks and snacks. The night of the dance, I set up a table and the stereo. I didn’t have to do much work other than these few things. I was the DJ, so I didn’t get a chance to dance myself, but I enjoyed setting up the event so others could have fun.
I knew everyone who came to the dance, so it wasn’t an opportunity to meet new people. If others are thinking of organizing a dance as a way of meeting new people, one thing to do would be to put your ad out earlier than we did, and try to get the word out to people in different parts of the state. I already had a group of homeschooling friends, but I think organizing a dance would work even if you didn’t already have a group of friends. It might help in that case to say a little more in the ad about what you were planning.
I used to go to school dances, but I wanted this to be for homeschoolers. The atmosphere was different. There was more supervision, and it was more fun with parents there too. The kids didn’t mind having the parents there - the parents weren’t getting in the way, and sometimes they were getting up and dancing too. I made sure to have different kinds of music, and we even had some square dancing. I wasn’t sure how to do that, but my friend’s father is a square dance caller so I had him do it.
I think this could be a good way for homeschoolers who have never been to a dance to have a chance to go. Afterwards people came up and told me they’d had a nice time. I might do another dance again sometime, although I’m not planning anything definite right now.
FEELING OK ABOUT BEING AN OLDER READER
[SS:] When I was interviewing Anita Giesy about her experience with school’s social life for this issue’s Focus (see page 19), our conversation turned to the subject of older readers. Anita, by her own description, only began to read fluently at about age 12 (she’s now 17). I had been thinking about the stories about older readers that were in the past couple of issues of GWS, and it seemed to me that often what was hardest for these young people was not the fact of not being able to read, but the problem of handling situations in which reading was expected, or feeling pressured or different from others of the same age. Anita and I talked about how she handled these situations in the hopes that others would find her perspective and experience helpful.
We always say that it doesn’t matter when you learn to read, but some of the kids we hear from, or about, seem to find it so hard not to be able to read at, say, 9 or 10 - because others tease them or think they ought to know how. From what you’ve told us in the past, it seems as if you managed to escape that.
I didn’t escape it totally, but I escaped enough of it to relax. When I babysat, there were some kids I was very comfortable reading to because they weren’t judgmental. One girl was old enough to know that I was supposed to be reading better at my age, but she wasn’t judgmental if I stumbled on a word.
I still, every once in a while, get anxiety attacks at the thought of reading aloud, even if it’s something I could read to myself. I have to put my fears aside and say, “Yes, you can do this.”
A mother wrote to us about her daughter being in a situation in which other kids wanted to play a game that involved reading and writing. This girl couldn’t really participate, and she said they didn’t understand that she was trying her hardest. Should parents try to protect their kids from these situations, or help them cope with them?
I was lucky because I had my friend Ellie, and she understood. We often played games with her younger brother, who, being younger, wasn’t a great reader either, so she would just read all the questions (or whatever it was). At home, we played a lot of games that involved question-reading, and Mom would either help me or just read them, depending on how tired I was and whether or not I was in a mood to try reading them myself.
I think parents have to say to their child, “Yes, there are going to be kids out there who read better than you do, but if you want to try, or to work on this, I’ll help you.” That was always Mom’s line: “If you’re ready to try, I’ll help you any time.” But it was my choice one way or the other. Just try to tell the child that it’s not bad that she can’t read, but it is going to limit her sometimes.
It seems to me that if everyone was only saying, “It’s OK, don’t worry about it,” maybe a child could come to feel that the adults were giving up on her, that they never expected her to read at all. Somehow you knew that people didn’t feel that about you.
Mom said in so many words, “You can read, you just need to work on it more.” She always made it clear that I could do it, but I would have to put time into it to get to the goal of being able to read smoothly. At first I read slowly, one word at a time, and it was hard to get the flow of the sentence. I knew that I would have to work on it to be able to read more smoothly, but that if I could do that, reading would be less frustrating.
When Mom read aloud to me, I would follow along. I could learn without feeling that I had to read myself. Then Mom started realizing that I was reading along with her when we would read at night. She would start to fall asleep, and I would get impatient and want to go on with the story, and I would point to where we were, so she knew I was reading enough to know that. And later I would read to myself when Mom was sewing, and when I came to a word I didn’t know I would spell it out, she would tell me what it was, and then I’d continue.
That’s interesting, because it reminds us that it’s not as if you suddenly started reading at 12 without having been able to read at all before then.
No, it was definitely a gradual process. Twelve was when I was able to read smoothly and comfortably.
Let’s come back to the kids who are in difficult situations with people who expect them to read.
It would be even harder if we were in a daily situation, like school. But also, you learn to adapt - I’ve read about tricks that adult non-readers use, and when I read that now I think, “Oh, I know that one!”
What’s an example of a trick?
Reading every other word to try to get a quick sense of what something’s about. I often felt that I would have been able to read something if I could slow down and take my time, but if I was afraid that people would think I was dumb if I really took the entire time that I would need, I would try to read every other word to get a feeling for what it was about. When I was in Carousel when I was 8, we went out for something to eat afterwards, and I looked at the menu and thought, “Oh no, what am I going to order?” But I ended up ordering what one of the other people had ordered.
But when you use a trick you do think, it would be easier if I just knew how to read.
I wrote to one girl who had been in a difficult situation and said maybe she would have to learn how to say, “Reading is hard for me and it’s something I’m working on.” Were you ever able to say that?
When I was younger I think I was good enough at the tricks. But when I was older and more comfortable with the idea, I would sometimes say that, like to the kids I babysat for. I would say it’s not my best thing, and I can read now but I don’t always read fast, and if I get nervous it’s even harder for me. It takes being strong, knowing that this is a weakness, not a failure, and it will come in time.
One thing that happened a lot, that I would never give in to, was other people quizzing me: “What’s this word?” “How do you spell this?” I just refused. I said, “I don’t get quizzed.”
You said that you knew you would have to work on reading, and that it was your choice when to do that. I think some people wonder whether kids will ever try to do something that’s so hard for them. What made you decide to work on it?
I don’t think there was any one moment, but it was just a basic feeling of, for example, being sick of having Mom read me the menu in a restaurant, wanting to be able to read over the descriptions myself. I was getting to the age where I might be going out with someone else besides Mom, and I didn’t want looking at the menu to be a big deal. I also wanted to be able to read to myself. If I got a letter, I wanted to be able to read it privately.
You get to a point where there’s enough reading in the world that you want to be able to do it. I think kids in school who can’t read would get to that point, but they’re ashamed of it, so they keep it to themselves and there’s no one to help them.
I think it will be so helpful to people just to hear from you that it all works out eventually.
I feel it has worked out, and you know, I feel it’s an even bigger accomplishment for me when I finish a book. I went through a period where I would read parts of lots of books but never finish any, so now I’m proud that I can finish them.
I still have to stop myself from shying away from things that involve reading in public. The camp that I go to is divided up into tribes, with chiefs, and I used to shy away from being a chief because I knew it involved writing down information and relaying it to the group. But this year I was the chief, and I found that the writing in that situation was very easy. So I have to say to myself, “You can do it, don’t shy away from something just because you think you can’t.”
I think that question about shying away comes up for homeschoolers who might like to get to know someone in another state but are afraid of the writing part of it.
My mother’s my editor. John Holt was the only person I felt comfortable writing to by myself, sounding things out and spelling them as best I could, because I knew he wouldn’t judge it.
I guess someone might say, “But what happens when you leave home and don’t have your mother around?”
I have a dictionary. And when I’m traveling next year, my journal will be for me, so I won’t worry about how it’s spelled.
It’s interesting that you talk about keeping a journal - it means that writing has a place in your life even if it’s been hard for you.
I’ve always loved writing. I’m the only one of Mom’s children who has written for the joy of writing. It was always made clear to me that I should go ahead and spell something how I wanted to spell it and then correct it later, or I could ask Mom how to spell a word. My grandmother once asked if I wouldn’t learn to spell the word better if I had to use the dictionary, and I told her no, after you call out a word and have it spelled to you enough times, you remember it. And it’s interesting - my older sister developed her spelling skills by spelling words to me.
A homeschooler I know, who finds reading difficult, wants to get involved with theater, but is afraid of having to read scripts. What should she do - not get involved with it, do it and explain to people, find an improvisation group that won’t require reading…?
I think she should either find time to get away by herself to read it as slowly as she needs to, or explain to the group, “I am a slow reader, I need time to work on figuring it out, but by the time we go on I will have it ready.” When I did that play when I was 8, I took it home and memorized it right away, so I dealt with it that way.
I like the idea of saying, I’m a slow reader” instead of “I can’t read” or “I’m a bad reader.” I like the way that implies that you can do it, even if it will take a little extra time.