Page One
Monday, May 22nd, 2006GROWING WITHOUT SCHOOLING Issue #68
Adolescence has a terrible reputation, and teenagers know it. “When I turned 13,” writes Vita Wallace, “the thing that I worried about most was that I would suddenly be considered a confused and frivolous teenager.” “There is a popular belief,” echoes Anna-Lisa Cox, “that teenagers are not only supposed to behave miserably, they are supposed to feel miserable as well. “It’s a difficult time,” adults traditionally sigh.
Maybe it is. Maybe there are things about it that will be difficult no matter what anyone does. But what comes through so clearly in the teenagers’ writing in this issue of GWS is that adolescence doesn’t have to be as bad as we assume. The teenagers who wrote for this issue were asked to answer the question, “What do you want from adults?,” and it’s hard to read their responses without feeling that they deserve to get what they’re asking for. “Respect,” they say, over and over again. “Civility.” And, perhaps most important, adults who will help them find ways to do the work, the activities, that they are discovering they want to do.
The interesting thing about these particular teenagers, all of whom have spent some time homeschooling and many of whom have never been to school at all, is that the stories they tell here are more often than not about getting what they want from adults. They may know that they can’t count on this from everyone, and they may have had frustrating experiences as well (some of which they do describe here), but they are also able to give example after example of adults taking them seriously and helping them to do what they want to do. Carey Newman’s parents helped her get permission to have a show of her wildlife sketches at a nearby gallery. Emma Roberts finds that the adults in her community theatre group treat her like a serious professional. Chelsea Chapman has an adult friend who was willing to help her write a play. And so on. Somehow these young people are finding ways to overcome adolescence’s negative reputation and to get what they need from the adult world.
What’s striking about the examples the writer’s give in these pages, when set against the conventional view of teenagers, is that instead of wanting a separate youth culture, these young people want to be let in to the world of adults. They want to work with adults, to hear what older people have to say as long as they’re allowed to form their own opinions and make their own mistakes.
Does the fact that these teenagers aren’t in school explain why they would rather be part of the world at large than part of some separate teenage world? Some might say it does, because school is where the youth culture flourishes. But I think we have to look further and ask why it is that teenagers in conventional high schools seem more likely drawn to a separate youth culture and alienated from the adult world. I submit that it’s because that separate culture is too often the only one available to teenagers in school. We deny them meaningful access to the adult world and then wonder why they seem so bitter and resentful toward it. What teenagers need - if I can presume to speak for them for a moment - is adults who can say, “This is adulthood, and it’s pretty good, so come on along.” Many of the teenagers who wrote for this issue seem to have such adults in their lives, and we ought to think about how to make that possible for other teenagers as well.
The teenagers in this issue, without consciously intending to, manage to present a vivid picture of what homeschooled teenagers are doing, and of what adolescence can be for teenagers who are able to explore the wider world and find out how they want to fit into it - teenagers, in other words, who are allowed to get right to some of the important tasks of growing up without having to worry about grades, school assignments, popularity, and so on. These accounts should inspire younger readers who may see possibilities for themselves in them, and older readers who will, after they’ve finished with this issue of GWS, have no excuse for not giving teenagers the respect, and the kind of help, that they so clearly say they want. ¾ Susannah Sheffer
OFFICE NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS
[SS:] Since our last issue went to press, Pat Farenga testified as an expert witness at Clonlara’s trial in Michigan. The trial resulted in a victory for Clonlara and for homeschoolers in Michigan, as you’ll see in the story at the right.
An article I wrote for the American School Board Journal called “What Schools Can Learn from Homeschoolers,” is scheduled to run in their My issue, I’m told, so those of you who read that publication can watch for it. I hope it will be useful to some of you who are dealing with school officials, as it also suggests some ways in which schools can help homeschoolers.
I spoke for a while with a writer from U.S. News & World Report, who was doing a story on the learning disability label, (”Labeling Away Problem Kids,” in the March 13, 1989 issue). She asked for the name of a family who had challenged the LD label, and I thought of the Smeltzers, who had testified in behalf of the Pennsylvania homeschooling bill. I was happy to see the Smeltzers featured in the final article. Later I talked to Gerald Coles, author of The Learning Mystique, (now available from us in paperback), who had also spoken with that reporter. He said that as he travels around the country promoting his book he hears many stories of children who are suffering under the LD label. The problem is indeed an urgent one; we hear many of those stories here, too.
We want to thank the many volunteers who have given us important help in recent weeks. David Swank, Don Stevens, Mary Steele, and Mohammed Fajd helped us get out a bulk mailing. Nancy Fiero helped us update our Learning Materials List, Loretta Heuer sent out our renewal reminders (which she has been doing for several months), Peggy and Emma Roberts spent a day in the office helping with all sorts of tasks. Yaron Goldman, who traveled from Illinois last year to spend a week volunteering with us, decided to return and bring his whole family with him, and they were all a big help.
Our postal forwarding order will expire in a few months, and we want to update our address in as many places as possible before this happens. We will send labels with our new address to any of you who would like to put them in copies of John Holt’s books in your local library. Also, we notice that quite a few local newsletters are still using our old address. Please do us the favor of reminding the person in charge of your local newsletter about this.
Another simple way that you can help us is by sending us names of pediatricians, dentists, etc. to whom we might send sample issues of GWS. We’re thinking that, particularly in smaller communities, some of these doctors might subscribe to the magazine and add it to those in their waiting rooms. When you send us the names, let us know whether it’s OK to mention you by name in the cover letter that we’ll include with the sample issue.
Many of you have waited very patiently for How Children Learn to become available again. It’s here at last. The publishers have also reprinted Teach Your Own, so we have plenty of those on hand.
NEWS & REPORTS
VICTORY IN MICHIGAN
On February 14, Judge Thomas Brown rules in favor of Clonlara Home Based Education Program in the suit that Clonlara had brought against the Michigan Department of Education. The ruling means that the Department of Education can no longer use the procedures (regulations) governing home education that it had established in 1986.
Some background: In early October of 1986, the Department and Board of Education adopted what they called “Nonpublic School and Home School Compliance Procedures.” These procedures required homeschooling parents to use a state certified teacher daily for 180 days of the year, and to keep the teacher’s certificate and other information on file with the Intermediate School District. Shortly thereafter Clonlara, and one of its parents, filed suit against the state’s procedures, limited to Clonlara families.
The preliminary injunction meant that the procedures with which Clonlara families had to comply were modified: the teacher no longer had to be physically present, and could be used for a minimum of two hours a year. But Clonlara still found the procedures vague and violative of parents’ rights in practice - home schools were being held to standards and requirements more restrictive than those for any other nonpublic school - so they returned to court to seek a permanent injunction.
Judge Brown’s February 14th ruling granted it to them, declaring that “the procedures are illegal and without basis in statute.” He ordered the Department of Education to develop new procedures and to submit them to him for approval. At GWS’s press time, then, Michigan is without any homeschool regulations, and Clonlara and the state’s homeschooling parents are waiting to see what new procedures the Department will submit.
OTHER STATE NEWS
For addresses of state and local organizations, see GWS #66 or our Homeschooling Resource List, available for $2.
Connecticut: Homeschoolers attended an Educational Committee hearing on February 6th to learn more about bills dealing with truancy, including one that defines a truant as a child who “misses more than 15 days a year without a certificate from a licensed physician stating that… the child was unable to attend school for medical reasons,” according to the March/April issue of Hearthnotes, the newsletter of the CONNECTICUT HOMESCHOOLERS ASSOCIATION.
Maine: On December 20, the Maine Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the state’s homeschooling regulations are constitutional, according to the December issue of the ReMAINEing at Home newsletter. The case was an appeal by the Blount family, who had attempted to homeschool under the state’s guidelines for non-approved private schools, rather than under those for homeschooling. The Blunts argued that they were a legitimate private school under the state’s regulations, but the court agreed with the state’s claim that the family ought to follow the homeschooling regulations instead.
North Dakota: On February 20, over sixty national and state homeschool leaders. and four to five hundred homeschool advocates, rallied in protest of the state’s treatment of homeschoolers, according to a press release from the NORTH DAKOTA HOMESCHOOL ASSOCIATION. Several cases involving homeschooling families are pending in North Dakota courts. Reverend Clinton Birst of NDHSA told us that several recent events fueled the protest: “…One family was fined four thousand dollars, children were forced on the stand as state’s evidence, the Department of Human Services threatened to block an adoption of a homeschooling family which was charged with deprivation of education (court evidence showed, however, that the child in question was well educated), and a homeschooled child was being denied the opportunity to participate in the state spelling bee.”
Wisconsin: The legislature passed a truancy law which requires counties to establish local ordinances regarding truancy, according to the February issue of the WISCONSIN PARENTS ASSOCIATION newsletter. WPA advises parents to check with public officials to see whether a particular county’s truancy procedures affect homeschooled children. WPA also adds that although statutes say that attendance officers do not have the authority to check the attendance of homeschooled students not enrolled in the local school district, they may request attendance information from homeschooling parents if they have reason to suspect truancy (truancy from the home school, in other words).
STUDY OF SOCIAL INVOLVEMENT
From the results of a study on homeschooling by Susan V. Groover, a graduate student at the University of Georgia, involving a sample of ninety homeschoolers in Georgia (the study’s full title s, “Family Environment and Attitudes of Homeschoolers and Non-homeschoolers”):
The homeschoolers were divided into three groups according to the reasons they gave for deciding to homeschool their children… those who gave academic reasons only (Group A), beliefs/values reasons only (Group B), or both academic and beliefs reasons (Group AB). The fourth comparison group (Group PS) was comprised of families recommended by homeschoolers who sent their children to public schools instead of teaching them at home.
…No significant differences were found between the four groups in any areas of social relationships. Parents were shown to be equally involved in their communities. Children’s social involvement, measured by the number of groups the child belongs to, was very similar among groups. No differences were found in the amount of the child’s peer interactions, which was measured by the number of friends they have and how often they get together inside and outside the home.
Also interesting, from elsewhere in the results of the study:
Public school parents allowed much more television viewing than all homeschoolers, 29% of whom had no TV in their homes.
COOPERATIVE SCHOOL
Ilana Goldman (IL) writes:
When we took Yaron out of school in fifth grade, the one activity he was sorry to miss was band. We approached the elementary school teacher about the possibility of Yaron’s taking just a few classes at the school. He seemed offended and threatened by the idea of homeschooling, and doubtful of our ability to teach Yaron, saying things like, “It’s already August and you don’t have a curriculum yet?” He added that he “didn’t have the manpower to supervise Yaron’s coming and going.”
The next year we decided to give the idea another try, this time at the junior high. Ready for a major confrontation, we went into the principal’s office, and voila! He thought it was a great idea. During Yaron’s years at the junior high we have constantly found the school personnel cooperative, flexible, and understanding of our special situation. For instance, when Yaron did not like the art class he was taking, he simply pulled out in the middle of the semester without any problems. He also took two months off in the middle of the school year (to go to school in Israel, and then to travel in Europe) with no objections from anyone at the school.
We have had an interesting experience with gym. Yaron did not like the compulsory shower after class, so we didn’t send him to gym in seventh grade. When the gym teacher discovered why Yaron wasn’t coming to gym, he told him that he didn’t have to take the shower, and that he really would like him to come back - which he happily did.
As Yaron is now in eighth grade, I was a bit worried about having to start all over with the high school. As it turned out, all it took to get the same kind of cooperation was one short phone call to the principal. It seems that once you get into the system it is easier to deal with other schools.
An interesting aspect of our arrangement with the schools is how much everyone involved enjoys it. Yaron goes only to classes of his choice, and therefore has a great time; his teachers are thrilled to have a student that is really interested and enthusiastic; and I love being able to provide him with enriching activities within walking distance.
This point was really brought home recently when Yaron called the Science and Industrial Technology head at the high school to find out what level science class he should enroll in, and whether he needed to take all the prerequisite courses for electronics. After a five minute conversation, the man told Yaron that he should take the most advanced science course, and that he would waive the numerous prerequisites for both that and electronics, since Yaron obviously already knew the stuff. Nobody tested him or questioned his abilities because they were so impressed with his interest and enthusiasm.
CALENDAR
May 5-7, 1989: California Coalition of People for Alternative Learning Situations (CC-PALS) annual state conference in San Luis Obispo. For information, send SASE to: Laurel Stephens/CC-PALS, PO Box 456, San Luis Obispo CA 93406.
June 10-11: Clonlara Home Based Education Program Conference in Plymouth, Michigan. Pat Farenga and Susannah Sheffer (and many others) will lead workshops. For information: Clonlara, 313-769-4515.
We are happy to run announcements of major homeschooling and related events, but we need plenty of notice. Deadline for GWS #69 (events in July or later) is May 10. Deadline for GWS #70 (events in September or later) is July 10.
GROWING WITHOUT SCHOOLING #68, Vol. 12 No. 2. Date of issue: April 1, 1989.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING AND TEACHING
In GWS #64, Nancy Wallace wrote about her daughter Vita giving violin lessons to a six-year-old friend named Justin. Now Nancy writes:
Surprisingly, since Vita is a violinist and pianist but not, like her brother Ishmael, a composer, her violin lessons with Justin have gradually turned into composition lessons. Sometimes Vita and Justin don’t play at all, but every week he brings in a fresh page of sheet music, lovingly notated in blue and red ink.
One day, when they were still dutifully going through the first Suzuki violin book piece by piece, Justin arrived at a lesson and announced, “I can read music!” And he could. His mother had shown him that the printed notes on a page symbolized actual pitches that he could make on his violin, and she had pointed out that by memorizing the location of just one note on the staff - in this case it was the A on the second space up - he could figure out the rest of the notes by interval.
This knowledge seemed to give Justin an incredible sense of power. He no longer had to wait for people to teach him songs. He soon realized, though, that there was more to music-reading than just figuring out the notes that the composer wanted him to play. The next week he asked Vita plaintively, “How come when I play the right notes the piece STILL doesn’t sound the way I know it should?” “Well,” she said, with more honesty than diplomacy, “You are going to have to play the proper rhythms as well.”
Like many children who learn to read words by writing them, Justin apparently needed to write music down in order to really understand it. He began writing notes, as if that was the only way that he could clarify for himself the different rhythmic quantities that notes represent. The act of writing them down set them firmly in his mind, more firmly than any teacher could have instilled them in him with the usual method of making him clap out rhythms. After that, every time he learned a new technique on the violin he asked Vita to write it. Seeing how it looked on the page invariably helped him to play it. Justin was now writing page after page of music, and yet in his own mind, and certainly in Vita’s, he was still a violinist - a violinist busily learning as much as he could about how to read music.
Perhaps Justin trusted all along that Vita would be able to teach him the things he felt he needed to know in order to become a composer. Maybe that’s why, after the initial excitement over note-reading wore off, he still patiently unpacked his violin, and played for her each week, even though we could all sense that he was itching for something else to happen. But what? Justin didn’t seem to know, and for several agonizing weeks it seemed as if all he could do was wait, and keep asking his questions, until he was conscious enough of what he really wanted to be able to ask Vita for it in words.
The problem for Vita, though, was that more often than not Justin’s questions seemed more like symptoms of frustration than anything else. I sometimes wondered if his questions weren’t simply a stalling tactic, a way to avoid telling Vita that he had lost interest in the violin altogether. Vita offered no theories of her own, but she was obviously troubled by the way things were going. Yet when, as so often happened, Justin set down his violin in the middle of playing a piece to ask Vita how to write stems on quarter notes, she always told him immediately. Neither Vita nor Justin realized why he was more interested in stemming notes than in playing nice pieces. Vita worried that she wasn’t giving Justin what he really needed, and I know she worried that one day he might simply stop coming to lessons.
Fortunately, she kept answering Justin’s questions the minute he asked them, even when that meant interrupting the music they were playing. Justin kept coming, and one day he brought the beginnings of a real piece to a lesson. After that, he arrived each week with new drafts and new additions. Rather than interrupting the main business of the lesson - violin - the piece seemed to complement it since, in a way, it renewed Justin’s interest in playing. The piece was like a journal of everything Vita was teaching him to play, and in order to develop more ideas for the piece he played more.
It certainly wasn’t the typically tuneful piece that you would expect a child to write. There’s no way you can hum it the way you might hum “Mary Had a Little Lamb.” There are no real melodies in the piece at all, perhaps because Justin was primarily concerned with exploring all of the technical possibilities of violin playing and notation. Sometimes, watching this young boy had Vita the latest addition to his piece, I was tempted to wonder if he was concerned with anything beyond constructing a random hodgepodge of technical “fireworks.” But each week Justin made it clear that he had definite ideas about where he wanted the piece to go and how he wanted it to sound.
“Play that,” he often said to Vita as he set his music on the stand. When she did, he might then single out a measure and say, “But I meant it to slow down there.”
“Oh,” she’d say. “Shall we add a ritard?”
“Yes,” he’d say. “How do you write it?” (This is a kid, I kept reminding myself, who can barely read!)
It never once occurred to Vita to doubt the legitimacy of Justin’s interest in or ability for composing, and I think she even stopped noticing when he forgot to unpack his violin at lessons. Yet it was almost without thinking that she finally put a label on what he was doing. “Did you compose more during this week?” she asked one day as he walked in the door. Imperceptibly, over the past weeks, Justin had again taken control of the lessons. His mind no longer seemed to wander, he no longer itched with obvious frustration. And yet it seemed to me that it was only when he heard the word “compose” ascribed to his week’s work that he (and Vita) finally became conscious of the change that had taken place.
Where another teacher might have been disappointed because Justin now openly preferred writing music to playing it, Vita wasn’t disappointed at all. She had been willing to live with confusion and frustration rather than doubt him, but now she was simply relieved that he was so clear about the work he wanted to do and the ways in which she could help.
[SS:} I responded:
Your story says so much about learning and teaching, and, interestingly, about their interdependence. In the traditional teaching model, the whole question of whether Justin was there to learn to play the violin or to write music would have been in an important sense up to Vita. If she saw herself as a violin teacher only, she might not have had the interest or the patience to wait out the gradual but significant shift in Justin’s priorities. She might well have said, “I offered to teach violin; if you want something else, you’ll have to look elsewhere for it.” I don’t think she would necesssarily have been to blame if she had said this - we can’t make people teach what they don’t want to teach any more than we can make people learn what they don’t want to learn. But it would have made things different for Justin.
If, on the other hand, Vita had been willing to teach Justin whatever he wanted to learn, but had been too uncomfortable during the period of ambiguity and frustration to allow it to resolve itself by itself, she might have jumped in and decided to teach composition before Justin was sure that that was what he was asking of her. “Justin’s interest in the violin is flagging,” she might have thought to herself. “I’ll have to do something to keep him interested in lessons.”
Neither of these things are what happened, and I’m thinking of yet a third thing that might have happened but didn’t. Justin might have decided to go it completely alone, thinking to himself that Vita was no longer giving him exactly what he wanted (even if he couldn’t yet articulate what he did want). He might have stopped taking lessons soon after he began to feel vaguely dissatisfied, and then - well, I don’t know what would have happened then. Certainly he might have figured out, at some time and in some way, that composition was what he really wanted to do. But what fascinates me, in your story, is how Justin was able to figure this out with Vita’s help. I’m inteested in how their sticking together through this somewhat confused time helped Justin discover what he most wanted from Vita, and Vita discover how she could best give it to him.
People often ask me whether self-directed learning puts teachers out of business. What it does is radically change what that business is. Figuring out how you can be most helpful to learners who are at the same time figuring out what they want to learn and how you can help them is not the same as deciding what you will teach and then teaching it. But it is not nothing, either. This is what I’m really trying to say, that Vita was part of Justin’s process of discovery in a hundred ways, most of which we’ll probably never know.
Just as I was thinking about all of this, a letter arrived from Kim Kopel, one of the young writers I’ve been working with. She says so well how self-directed learners can make use of teachers that I have to quote from her letter:
“I used to feel that I had to work and work on a piece and perfect it as best I could before I sent it to you, so you wouldn’t have to make many suggestions for changes or revisions, because I found it hard to get used to someone criticizing my work, and so I felt that if I made it perfect enough it wouldn’t have to be revised. I felt that having someone else suggest changes, revisions, etc. made the work less original, less mine. Now I realize that having someone else do this offers me more possibilities and freedom than ever could have been available if I did not have a teacher.
“…I think there was a time when I was focusing more on what you would think of what I’d written than really working on saying what I meant or what I wanted to say. Now I revise and am critical of my own work as I used to be, but it’s very hard to be your own most critical critic! You are very sharp, and don’t miss anything, so I can count on you to show me all the things I missed - this could make me lazy, but I’ll be careful. You really keep me on my toes - I have to be ready to give account for and explain my thoughts and ideas for everything I write. I think this has made me a more careful writer. I work harder to make sure I’m saying exactly what I mean, that it’s perfectly clear, that I’m to the point and don’t wander… Before, I looked at making revisions and changes as something that needed to be done before whatever I’d written was ‘finished,’ but now I enjoy the process of it, as much as I enjoy writing the first draft.”
What Kim has learned fully enough to be able to describe, and what Justin has learned more unconsciously, is how to involve other people in work that is very definitely their own. I can’t think of a more important skill for a young person, or any person, to have.
CHALLENGES & CONCERNS
LEARNING NOT TO PUSH
Sandi Hall wrote in the January issue of the Homeschoolers’ Voice, a Washington newsletter:
I should know better. I am the homeschool advocate who has told hundreds of new and old homeschoolers that they shouldn’t push their children… So why did I start demanding that my 7 year old, Kyle, sit down every day and write every letter of the alphabet?
It all began when we were at a family reunion and my five-year-old nephew began to write his alphabet. My mind began to race - “What if they asked my son to do this?” I knew he could handle most of the letters but only in upper case. His young cousin was using both.
When we got in the car and headed for home I asked Kyle to write his alphabet for me. He seemed to panic, claiming that he didn’t know them all. I said I just wanted to see the ones he did know and that way I would know which ones to help him with when we got home. He did great! He would sing the alphabet song over and over to get the letters. I smiled as I listened to his, “A,B,C,D… A,B,C,D,E… A,B,C,D,E,F…” At about M or N he shouted excitedly, “I DO know them!” and continued to with much more enthusiasm. When he proudly handed it to me (apologizing for the wiggly lines because Daddy was driving over too many bumps) I saw that he did indeed know how to write his alphabet and only three of the letters were reversed. Not bad, I thought.
The next day I continued with my effort to get Kyle to practice his letters. Once through and I’d read him his favorite book. With a sigh he complied. On about the third or fourth day his sighs became louder and longer. He made statements like, “I’m not ready to learn this. I planned on waiting until I was * to learn this. I feel like I’m in school.”
I lectured him on the need to know how to write now because he was going to be with other 7 year olds who could write. My wise son then told me, “But Mom, not everybody learns the same things at the same time.”
I thought about this all evening and discussed the issue with my husband. He was as wise as his son and pointed out that Kyle was simply repeating what he had heard me say over and over again. I thought about several friends who talked about their sons and daughters who waited until age 9 or 10 to read and write. I might have to put up with some raised eyebrows from family and friends, but I decided Kyle was going to keep his excitement over learning.
The next day I told Kyle he was right. I should not be forcing him to learn something he did not feel ready for. I gave him an old workbook on the alphabet and said it was his to use as he wanted. If he wanted any help from me I would be ready today or next year, but it was his choice. Twice that day he picked up the workbook and began working away, telling me his plans for how much he would complete each day.
I also make special efforts to find other ways for him to practice his writing. He wants to do a special project - I have him make the list of supplies. Or if his younger sister asks how to form a letter Kyle is very proud of the fact that he can help.
He also loves science so we did some observation and classification of different types of trees on our property. I suggested that he write down the full name of the tree and I would list his observations. He thought that was great because he knows that paper work is important for scientists keeping track of their findings.
THE TROUBLE WITH SOCIALIZATION
Paula Hildreth wrote in the Winter 1989 issue of Pennsylvania Homeschoolers:
Since we moved from the country to a neighborhood nine months ago, I have been the unwilling recipient of many lessons on the negative aspects of socialization. We’d always lived in the country, and our children had much more limited contact with other kids than most children do. They saw children every week at church, and some of Jessica’s clubs and lessons included other children. Of course, we always had other children “shipped in” from time to time, but there were no regular playmates.
This could have been a fiasco, since our children are all three years apart. But our children enjoyed each other in spite of the age difference, and from the first they played well and happily together. In fact, from the time Daniel now 6) was 1, he and Jessica (now 9) were so tight that they could spend a whole day together in intense little projects and playings. When other children came over, all the children that were present were involved in the play, so that if Jessica had some girls over, Daniel was accepted as part of the group, and vice versa. This is not to say that there weren’t quarrels and problems from time to time, because there were! But for the most part our children were close and loving friends.
When we moved to this neighborhood, things began slowly to change. There was only one other little boy Daniel’s age, but there were a few girls that came within Jessica’s age range. Jessica began to spend some time with one of the girls in particular. At first there seemed to be no negative effect on her. Slowly, over time, though, I began to see her change. First of all, Daniel was no longer allowed to join in the play when Jessica was with Debbie. Now, I know that Jessica and Daniel are not an inseparable pair, and I really do want each of them to form their own friendships. But they went from being friends to being enemies, and I was sad to see it happen.
Secondly, I saw Jessica try to act more and more like her new friends. She began to walk and laugh like one of her friends, and wanted to spend all her time with them. The situation reached its worst this summer, when the neighborhood kids were out of school. Apparently the other kids were allowed to run free all summer, with no restrictions; I think some of the kids left their houses after breakfast and didn’t come home until dark. This just isn’t the way we run our family, though. Jessica began to balk at practicing the piano every day (no one else had to do anything like that), and even resented spending time with us. Since she wouldn’t play with Daniel anymore, he began to be an active hardworking “pest.” He said he hated girls, and tried to interrupt their play and “spy” on them. I guess it was the only way he had to interact with Jessica anymore.
What’s funny about all of this (in a sad kind of way) is that I strongly suspect that most educators would have been much happier with Jessica’s socialization while all this was going on. After all, she was interacting often with her peer group, making new friends, and isn’t that what socialization is all about? Isn’t it great when our kids can fit in? It was a series of incidents that turned this whole situation around. First of all, Jessica was at the neighborhood playground one day, and she witnessed a little girl being made fun of and attacked in a terrible way. Jessica was the only one there who didn’t know the little girl - the child’s best friend was there, and even she turned on her - and Jessica was the only one who stood up for her. She was terribly shaken by this event, finding it hard to believe that people could be so cruel. But as much as this hurt Jessica’s heart, her friends thought nothing of it, and I think this is what really started Jessica thinking.
Other things began to happen: during the past six months, Jessica has seen big kids bully and threaten little kids, little kids hit big kids over the head with mallets, one of her friends being kicked in the mouth, and then thrown to the floor, by her mother, children purposely destroying toys that belonged to someone else, and a little 8-year-old girl who told her friends at a slumber party that she thought no one loved her and that she was going to go in the kitchen and kill herself with all the knives. I guess after seeing and hearing all these things, Jessica just got a belly full. She began gradually to distance herself from some of these children, and to spend more time with Daniel again. I’ve watched this happen with relief, and knew we were back on the right track when Jessica began to tell children who came to the door that she was busy playing with her brother right now, thank you - maybe she would play with them tomorrow. She does still play with neighborhood girls, but not very often, and when she does, I’ve noticed that Daniel is often included in the play. And backing away from these children has not left a void in her life. She is back into her projects, practicing piano more often, and above all she seems to be part of the family again.
I’ll admit that I tried my best to police the situation with the neighborhood kids when it was at its worst. Jessica wasn’t allowed to run all day with the rest of them, and I curtailed the time she spent with them. But with all the rules I imposed, and all the ways I tried to circumvent some of the “bad influences,” Jessica was the one who had to decide whether or not she wanted to be just like these other girls. I’m glad she decided she wanted to be herself and not one of the crowd. I’m also happy that she is able to play with other children from time to time without feeling that they have to take over her life and her actions. She seems to have struck a happy balance, all by herself. She’s able to play with them and have a great time when she wants to, but she has a clear idea of who she is, and has no problem telling other children, “Sorry, not now, I’m busy.” And this, I believe, is what healthy socialization is all about: not having to fit into the crowd, but having a deep sense of who you really are, and being able to meet others at that level.
CORRECTION
A sentence in Jan Hunt’s “Achieving A Critical Number of Supporters” (Focus on Children’s Rights, GWS #66) was printed incorrectly. The sentence should read: “There is, of course, no way to know what the critical number of humans must be for a new awareness of children’s’ rights to take hold; the implication from this ‘hundredth monkey’ phenomenon is that the number does not need to be large.” We apologize for the error.