Page One
Sunday, October 1st, 2006GROWING WITHOUT SCHOOLING
31 Date of Issue, Feb. 1, 1983
We had our first Open House at the GWS office - a great success. I had thought that perhaps, because of the rather short notice, very few people would come, but there were twelve or so families there, probably forty or more people in all. Everyone had a wonderful time, above all the children. It was lovely, as is usual at home school gatherings, to see children of many ages playing happily together, the big ones looking out for the little ones - a thing that too rarely happens with children who go to school. We’re looking forward to the next ones (second Thursday every month, 6-8 PM).
Wherever there are a number of homeschooling families and a convenient place for them to meet, it might be fun to have regular gatherings like this, as often as seems desirable and convenient. The advantage of having them at a regular time and place is, of course, that it saves the trouble and expense of sending out notices, and also lets people plan to attend well ahead of time. If any groups decide to do this, please let us know - and tell us how it works out.
Only one other word - try to avoid making these “business meetings”, complete with agenda, etc. Just have them a nice occasion for people to get to know each other and have a good time together. - John Holt
IMPORTANT MICHIGAN RULING
Time magazine, 1/10/83:
…In a strong, unambiguous decision, a Michigan judge reaffirmed the First Amendment guarantee of separation of church and state by exempting private Christian schools from state supervision of their curriculum and teachers. Ministers, teachers and parents of the Bridgeport Baptist Academy and the Sheridan Road Christian School, both near Saginaw, had charged that attempts by the state’s board of education to supervise curriculum and teacher qualifications violated their religious freedom. Judge Ray Hotchkiss agreed. ruling that the board, by imposing its secular standards of education on religious schooling, “interfered with plaintiffs’ constitutional right to freely exercise their religion”. Said Hotchkiss: “This court fails to see a compelling state interest in requiring nonpublic schools to be of the ’same standard’ as public schools in the same district. Such a scheme does not ensure even a minimum degree of quality of education.” Hotchkiss, however, did uphold the state’s right to impose on the Christian schools health and safety requirements, to which they had never objected.
The fundamentalists were jubilant at their victory. Said Sheridan Road Principal Bill Swain: “We knew our position was strongly supported by the Bible. We thought we had the Constitution on our side. But I didn’t expect to get a favorable decision.” William Bentley Ball, a leading constitutional lawyer who argued for the two schools, called the judgement “very strong on religious liberty, clarifying the right to teach and the right to learn.”
While the decision applies only to Michigan, it may influence other states. As independent Christian schools have proliferated over the past decade - with an estimated enrollment of 600,000 students nationwide - so have conflicts with state authorities. In Nebraska, the Rev. Everett Sileven of Louisville was jailed four times in 1982 for defying a court decision requiring him to hire state-approved teachers for his Faith Baptist School. In Massachusetts, Assistant Attorney General Maria Lopez has asked a civil court to impose a $100-a-day fine on two ministers who operate the Grace Bible Church Christian School in Dracut until they agree to report the names, ages and residences of their 30 students. In Maine, a major case will be tried in February. The issue, whether the teachers at the Bangor Baptist Church School and some 20 other Christian schools need to have state approval and whether the schools must maintain and report educational records…
In the Michigan trial, the issue of teacher certification turned out to be more of an embarrassment to state officials than to the Christian schools. Education experts could not agree on which standards to Christian teachers needed to follow, nor could they prove any link between certified teachers and good education. Noted Judge Hotchkiss, a former public school teacher: “The overwhelming evidence shows that teacher certification does not ensure teacher competency and may even inhibit it.” Since each student who leaves a Michigan public school to attend a Christian academy deprives the local school district of about $2,000 in state aid, the judge also observed that state officials were hardly disinterested guardians of education. He called state regulation of private schools “an incredible conflict of interest.”
…Michigan officials intend to appeal Judge Hotchkiss’s verdict. Says Assistant Attorney General Richard Gartner: “The state now has no process to approve nonpublic schools.” Part of Michigan’s compulsory education law says that parents must send children to state-approved schools. According to Gartner, there is now a legal doubt as to whether the compulsory attendance requirement is legal…
JOHN’S COMING SCHEDULE
Feb. 21. 1983: Guest of Honour, Harvard Dinner Series, Cambridge, MA. Apr. 9 (tent.): Homeschooling meetings and lectures, Chico CA area. Apr. 30: 6th Mass Area La Leche League Conf., Walsh Middle School, Framingham MA. Brown St, Ipswich MA 01938; May 3: International Reading Assoc. meeting, Anaheim CA. June 28-30: 7th Annual Kephart Memorial Child Study Center Symposium, Univ. of Northern Colorado, Aspen/Snowmass, CO. Aug.1-2: Child Development Symposium, Assoc. for Research & Enlightenment, Virginia Beach, VA. Anyone who wants to coordinate other meetings or lectures around these times and locations should contact me directly. - Peg Durkee
SUCCESS IN MICHIGAN Cheryl Wustman (MI) wrote:
…Jacob went through kindergarten last year, but this year we’re teaching him at home. It was so much easier than I thought it would be.
We wrote a letter to the Superintendent of the Kent County intermediate school district… We were told that if we wanted to we could enroll Jacob as a home bound student. This would mean he could receive all the material that the first graders are covering free. To receive this we would meet the first grade teacher every other Tuesday after school let out. It was that simple. So we’ve been doing this for the last month and a half. It has worked out perfect because the school is happy and we’re happy…
FAMILY MEETS LEGISLATOR
From John Boston (CA):
…When you spoke, John, in Anaheim, in 1981, you mentioned it would be helpful if our legislators know about homeschooling. You suggested we visit the, Well - that’s just what we did.
I first contacted our state senator’s office trying to find out if he could help clarify why some school districts were contacting some home schools on their legal status and other were not. His office said they would get back to me. A few days later, I got a call from one of his staff informing me as to the man who I could talk to about private schools in the State Dept. of Education. More importantly she asked if I would like an appointment to talk to the senator. I said yes, my son would like to meet him to learn about state government as a real-person experience. She gave us an appointment.
My wife and I, with our son (age 13), went to his office about 20 miles away. His secretary showed us into his office and introduced us. The senator was dressed leisurely, as were we, and he asked us to relax by sitting in some comfortable lounge chairs in one area of his office. We told him of our son’s unusual schooling arrangement, home learning, and of our private school. He wanted to hear from our son about what he did at home. Our son told him about his bicycles and model airplanes he built. He told him about his Boy Scout group, his religion classes, and his Humane Society volunteer work. We talked, informally, for close to 50 minutes. We found out the senator knows people we do so we had some things in common.
He invited our son (and us) to some up to Sacramento after the new legislative session starts and he would personally tour the Capitol with us. He was very interested in our son learning about government and gave him a booklet on our state’s constitution and how a bill becomes law. All in all a very pleasurable experience, both for our son and us.
I’m sure if anything about home schooling comes up in Sacramento our senator will feel more knowledgeable and positive about it. We would encourage other home schoolers to do this. Our legislators are the people who make the laws the school officials must follow! Get them, on our side! Let them know we are families concerned about our children!…
NOTES FROM DONNA
We had a nice visit from Rosalyn Frank of the Mass. Department of Education. She’s in charge of the “Gifted and Talented Special Programs” throughout the state, and is very sympathetic to the notion of homeschooling. She would like to know how many home-schoolers there are in Massachusetts, and would be willing to held someone do a survey of the various school districts. Would someone like to take on this research project?
Yet another home-schooler has sold an article to the “Mother’s Children” section of The Mother Earth News; that’s three at least. In the Jan. issue, Joshua Wood wrote about the same business selling sprout jars that his mother pat Stone told us about in GWS #21. Pat Stone of TMEN (1205 Stoney Mountain Rd, Hendersonville NC 28791) is always looking for how-to articles by young people. And if by chance he’s not interested in your story, we at GWS probably would be.
A 12-year-old reader suggests we put in a pen-pal section for kids. We’re willing to do this if it doesn’t take up too much space. So, any children wanting pen-pals, send in your name, age, address, and, if you want, 1-3 words about your hobbies, interests, favorite authors, etc.
We were distressed to hear that reader Rena Caudle’s son Jeremy has a massive brain tumor and is not expected to live beyond another year or so. Rena says, “If there are any readers that would like to boost up a little boy, cards would be welcomed. He’s collecting his cards and he’s collecting stickers too.”
Another reader asks if we could print more about divorced homeschooling parents, especially it the other parent disapproves of the homeschooling. has it ever been an issue in a custody case? Any of you who think your experience would be useful to others, please write to us.
Someone asked if we have any videotapes of T programs with John Holt. We don’t; none of us here have any video equipment. Do any of our readers have such videotapes; and if so, are they willing to loan them out, or can they make copies?
Rachael Solemn has just finished the 24-page index to GWS #1-30, which is available for $2.50. She’s done a thorough job with the help of a computer. Entries are in the following categories: Alternative Schools, Art, At Home, Authors, Books Quoted, Books Reviewed, Children Working, Colleges, Communities, Contributors, Correspondence Schools, Court Cases, Curriculum, Friendly Lawyers, Games, General, In School, Language, Learning, Local Schools & Legal Issues, Mathematics, Money, Music, Newsletters, Organizations, Poetry, Politics, Printing, Publications, Reading, Religion, Reports, Resources, Social Issues, Tapes, Teaching, tests, Teens Working, Travel, Work, Writing, and Young Graduates. Rachael welcomes suggestions for futures editions of the index.
At John’s suggestion, Mary and Mark Van Doren brought in a little table and chair for our office toddler, Anna. Our extra typewriter sits on it, and sometimes Anna will busy herself for a long time with the machine. Mary has a neat trick of taping two sheets of paper together into a loop, so that no matter how much Anna presses the “Return” key, she never runs out of paper. - Donna Richoux NEWS OF COURT CASES
We have recently gotten word of two home-schooling court cases lost, and a number of others pending. Of the losses, the bigger was the Virginia State Supreme Court ruling (12/3/82) against Robert and Vicky Grigg of Chesapeake. The court, using reasoning similar to California and Florida cases, said that since the Virginia compulsory education law has a specific exemption for “home instruction by a qualified tutor”, the Griggs could not claim exemption by a different route, namely, that their home was a private school. How this will affect other home-schoolers in Virginia remains to be seen.
The other loss was in Stephens County Superior Court, Georgia, involving Terry and Vickie Roemhild. We do not yet have any details on this decision.
Other families who are being prosecuted are: Wayne and Margaret Burrow, Little Rock, Arkansas; Mary and Garfield Morgan of Lebanon, Connecticut; Bob and Jean Smith, Albert Lea, Minnesota; the Warren Parker family, Alexandria, Minnesota; Pat Baker of the Southside School District, San Antonio, Texas; and Tahca Ska, Poplar, Wisconsin. - DR
GEORGIA REGULATIONS
[JH:] In two states, Georgia and Maryland, the State Boards of Education have proposed regulations that will make home-schooling difficult or impossible for most families. First, the Georgia situation. As the Atlanta Constitution of 1/13/83, in a story by Jane Hansen, reported it:
…RULES PUSHED TO END HOME SCHOOLING IN GA - …The state school superintendent has recommended standards to eliminate home schooling in Georgia in response to the growing number of parents who are teaching their children themselves… The new policy would further define private schools by requiring them to meet these criteria: 1) A minimum of 15 students must be enrolled in the program at least 4.5 hours daily and 180 days annually. 2) The building must be used primarily for instruction and must meet fire inspection codes. 3) At least one teacher must have a college degree from an accredited institution…” ____
[JH:] Home school families and parents and teachers involved in small church-based schools are banding together to try to block these regulations. The board is expected to vote on the policy on Feb. 10, so by the time you read this they will have decided either to pass these regulations or an amended version of them, or, if public pressure is strong enough, as we hope will be the case, to let the whole matter drop. We will tell you what happened in GWS #32.
Meanwhile, because education officials in other states, thrown into needless panic by stories about growing numbers of home schooling families, may try to make similar regulations, we might look at these a bit more closely. About them, three things can be said: 1) There is not the slightest educational justification for them. 2) They will probably be struck down in most or all courts in which they are put to the test. 3) Even if they were upheld by the courts, they would not automatically or necessarily make home schooling impossible.
We should understand ourselves, and help the public to understand that the first two of these proposed board regulations have nothing whatever to do with education or learning or even the quality of private schools. In defending the need for these regulations, the board has apparently said that it wants only to “clarify” the status of home schooling under law, so that it will know where and how to enforce the state’s compulsory school laws. This word “clarify” has been used in similar circumstances by education authorities in other states. In using the word, the board in Georgia is, to put it very politely, not being candid; as the newspaper story itself makes clear, they do not want to “clarify”, but to prohibit. More specifically they want to make private schooling so expensive that only a few rich can afford it.
The public schools have for a long time had a kind of silent bargain with the richest five percent of the parents of this country. They have said, in effect, “We will let you teach your children any way you want, if you will give us a monopoly over the other 95%.” Until recently, this is what has happened. private schools, meaning schools in buildings not used for other purposes and staffed by paid teachers, have been so expensive that with few exceptions only affluent parents could afford them. Almost all the private schools started by moderate or low income parents in the past twenty years have failed for lack of money, and those that have survived for any length of time have almost all been rich ones, with high tuitions and often large endowments. With very few exceptions, state and local public education authorities have never interfered with these rich schools. They could hire any teachers they wanted, not just those with education degrees and teacher’s credentials. They could teach any kind of curriculum they wanted, or none at all. State laws might mandate courses in state history, or health, or (as in NY) the dangers of alcoholism; rich private schools ignored such laws. In the fourteen years I taught in private schools we were never once visited or inspected by public education authorities. Rich private schools have their own private accrediting agencies, bur these are to allay the anxieties of rich parents of prospective students, not to satisfy any requirements of the state. The state’s position has always been and is now, whatever rich people want in the way of schooling for their kids, they can have -if the state can have complete control of all the rest.
What now scares the public education authorities is that the second part of this bargain is breaking down. More and more people who twenty or even ten years ago would never had considered sending their children to private schools are now doing so. Despite hard times and inflation, the median income of parents of private school children has been dropping every year now for a number of years. One reason is that more and more parents are becoming so critical of public schools that they are willing to make very larger money sacrifices to get their children out of them. But an even more important reason is that people are beginning to invent ways, among them home schooling, to make private schooling cost so much less that more and more people can afford it. This growth of low-cost private schooling is what the public school authorities are trying to stop, since it threatens their effective monopoly over the education of the great majority of American children. They say that it is the low quality of home schooling that worries them., but what really worries them is its low price tag.
Perhaps the best evidence that there is no educational need whatever for these regulations, let alone any compelling need, comes from Georgia itself. One of the books on our list is the PETERSON’S GUIDE TO INDEPENDENT STUDY THROUGH CORRESPONDENCE INSTRUCTION, which lists over 12,000 courses offered for academic credit not just at the high school but also the undergraduate and even the graduate level, by sixty-nine leading private and state colleges and universities. By happy chance one of these universities is the University of Georgia. Pages 52 and 53 of the Guide lists 68 lower level college and 96 upper level college courses which the university offers, for credit, by correspondence. lest any suspect these are some kind of Mickey Mouse courses, not really academic, here are the fields of study offering upper level courses: Agriculture, Archaeology, Anthropology, Ecology, Latin, American Literature, History (American, English, European, etc.), Philosophy, Government, Psychology, Sociology, Economics, Business Law and Management, Education, Forestry, Nutrition, and Journalism.
None of these many major departments or divisions at the leading university of the state seem to feel that in order for someone to learn the material in their courses they must be in a room with at least fourteen other people in a building not used for any other purposes, etc., etc. The University, like all the other universities listed in the guide, says, in effect, “We don’t care where, or how, or when, or in whose company, or with whose assistance (if any) you learn this material. If you can show that you have learned it, we will give you fill academic credit for it”. This should be enough to dispose of any idea that effective learning can only take place in certain special places where nothing else takes place, and in the company of some minimum number of people, and in the presence of a college graduate.
Beyond this we have as evidence the experience over many years and even decades of such correspondence schools as Calvert Institute, Home Study Institute, and a host of others we have listed in GWS. Calvert alone has estimated that over the years over 300,000 have used their home study course; the total figure for all the home correspondence courses put together must be close to half a million, and might well be more than that. Beyond that, there are right now many thousands of families in Alaska, in the northern parts of Canada, and in the “outback”, the great interior desert of Australia, where children are being educated, with the support and approval of state school systems, if only for the very good reason that they are many miles away from the nearest school. No one has ever produced a shred of evidence that all this home schooling has not produced satisfactory results. So, as I say, there is not the slightest educational justification for the regulations which the Georgia state board of education is proposing, or for similar regulations which we may see put forward in other states.
But let me say again, as at the start of this piece, that even if through some strange piece of twisted judicial reasoning a Georgia court were to uphold these regulations, they would still not necessarily or automatically close down all home schooling in the state. The regulations say there must be at least fifteen children in a school, but it should be easy for more than fifteen Georgia home schooling families to register their children in one or more schools, perhaps the Horizons School which already exists and in which many of them are already registered. Beyond that, there is no reason why home schooling families could not register their children with each others’ schools, so that family A would have in its school the children of families B, C, D, etc., and so on. Indeed , this would be a good thing for home schooling families to do in any state where home schooling may come under attack.
The regulations also say that the school must be in a building primarily used for instruction. But who could say, far less prove, that any home in which children were growing up, certainly any home school, was not being used primarily for instruction? What else happens in the home that is more important, or that occupies more of the time, thought, and energy of the parents? No reasonable person would claim that a home was used primarily for cooking, or eating, or sleeping. The regulations also talk about 4.5 hours a day of instruction, 180 days a year. But as countless parents have [pointed out, in a home school learning goes on twelve or more hours a day, 365 days a year. Again, who could reasonably claim, let alone prove, otherwise?
With such arguments as these, I think home schoolers may be able to persuade most state boards of education or comparable bodies, or the state legislatures themselves, that there is no good reason to try to pass regulations or laws such as those proposed in Georgia, which can serve no useful or legitimate purpose, and will only produce a great deal of litigation for our already terribly overcrowded courts - so overcrowded, it may be worth pointing out publicly, that all over the country they are unable to bring to a speedy trial criminals, often with long records, who have been arrested for violent crimes, but instead must let them back on the streets or, as is common, let them off with a greatly reduced sentence. We cannot say too often that our courts have far more important and indeed urgent things to do than pursue conscientious parents who are doing a capable job of teaching their own children.
ACTION BY GA. HOME-SCHOOLERS
Connie Shaw, editor of the Georgia home-schooling newsletter, A Different Drummer, sent us a copy of the information packet, including a list of recommended actions, that she sent to Georgia home-schoolers in order to fight the proposed regulations. It seems like such a thorough job, especially for being done on short notice, that we thought it would be useful to reprint in case other GWS readers faced a similar battle:
…Here is a checklist of things each of you can do to help in the days ahead: 1) Call your local legislators in the Georgia Assembly. Let them know what has happened and ask them to call their state board representative for their district (provide them with a phone number) and tell them to vote no on the proposed policy. This is where the real power is going to come from. If you know someone or has a friend who knows someone in the Capitol or on the Board of Education, let us know…
2) Call all 10 members of the Board of Education and let them know why you are opposed to the proposed ruling. Be careful not to attack openly the public schools. Calling is going to have more of an impact because they can easily overlook letters which they delegate to their secretaries to take care of. If you cannot call, then do write everyone a letter.
3) Sit down and compose a sincere letter for your local newspaper. Try to be tactful and project a good image of home schooling. If you are willing to be interviewed, contact local radio and TV stations and let them know what is happening and why you oppose it. We need favorable publicity.
4) Get signatures on the petition that is enclosed. Make copies if you need more. Return all petitions to Phillis Bostar before Feb. 5, so they can be presented to the school board at their meeting.
5) Duplicate this material as many times as you are able, and pass it along to other groups or individuals that you may know that are interested in the family and basic rights of citizens…
6) We need money. Whatever you can donate, please send. Money is needed to cover all the printing costs of this mailing, postage, envelopes, long distance calls, and other items…
7) Attend the meeting of home schoolers and interested citizens on Sat. Jan. 22… Bring copies of any letters you have written. Please share them with us so we can benefit from your ideas…
8) Attend the State School Board of Education Meetings on Wed. Feb. 9 and Thur. Feb. 10… Our numbers will carry a lot of weight at these meetings… Bring as many others as you can - parents, grandparents, friends, and other interested parties.
9) If you are seeking permission to speak out at the school board meetings, please bring a copy of your prepared speech to the meeting on the 22nd, to share with us.
…If everyone will actively participate, we will be able to win and maintain our rights to continue teaching at home. Do not let individual philosophies, religious beliefs, opposing lifestyles, or other differences divide us. We must stand solidly together on this one issue. …There is not much time. We need to move as quickly and deliberately as possible..
MARYLAND REGULATIONS
At the same time, the Maryland State Board of Education is proposing even more stringent regulations. Manfred Smith of the MARYLAND HOME EDUCATION ASSOCIATION tells us that home-schoolers will be at the public hearing Jan. 26 to testify against them. The Baltimore Sun of 1/16/83, in a story by Gail Campbell, sub-headlined “State move would virtually eliminate parent as teacher”, summarized the regulations and added some interesting comment. We quote, in part:
…Parents’ freedom to teach children at home instead of sending them to school will virtually end if the State Board of Education adopts a proposed revision of its bylaws. A draft bylaw would allow only parents with college degrees or certification in the subjects they teach their children to do home teaching. The draft also would require children to receive at home a minimum of 180 days, or 1080 hours, of instruction in courses such as English, language arts, mathematics, science and social studies. These home courses would have to be described to school officials in a written curriculum citing specific objectives and submitted to the local school superintendent for approval. Parents teaching at home would also have to provide books and materials comparable to those found in public school systems [JH: the regulations actually say they shall be “of good quality… and in sufficient variety and quantity…”], and the local superintendent would determine how often children should be tested to measure their progress… Last January, a Harford county couple were refused permission to teach their 7-year-old daughter at home., The county school board voted with one abstention to uphold Superintendent Alfonso A. Roberty’s decision and ordered Miguel and Ellen Andriolo to enroll their daughter Zoe in school immediately… Mrs. Andriolo is not a college graduate and therefore would not qualify as a home teacher under the proposed bylaw, but she said she felt she did a good job teaching her daughter at home in spite of that. “My daughter tested three grade levels above her own,” Mrs. Andriolo said. School officials tested Zoe after she had been taught for a year and a half at home… Dr. Roberty said he totally supported the proposed bylaw. “The qualifications are stringent, there’s no doubt about it, but it needs to be stringent. Otherwise, we’ll have everybody teaching everywhere with no specific curriculum,” Dr. Roberty said. “Some people don’t like uniformity, but when you’re running a school system, that’s what you need,” he added. Rabbi Kenneth B. Block, vice president of the Harford county school board, said he was equally opposed to the bylaw… “I think it’s too restrictive and unnecessary. They’re trying to legislate home instruction out of existence,” Rabbi Block said… He said… he believes families should have the option of teaching at home if they wish… W. Eugene Graybeal, president of the Harford county school board, saying he spoke as an individual citizen… said he too believes parents should have the choice of teaching at home. “But this bylaw the state board has in the works is to strengthen its control over home teaching. The trend should be to loosen its hold,” Mr. Graybeal said… ____
[JH:] Some comment on this particular story. It seems very likely that a reasonable court would rule that the Harford county school board erred in not allowing Mrs. Andriolo to continue teaching her own daughter, since she was obviously working more than twice as effectively as the schools. And, though a court would not say this, more reasonable citizens would further conclude 1) that Dr. Roberty was not competent to judge the qualifications of a home teacher, since he so obviously judged wrongly in this case, and/or 2) Dr. Roberty and the Harford county school board were clearly not acting in good faith, that is, in the best interests of the child, in acting as they did.
Beyond that, we can only wonder, since two members of the Harford county board said in these hearings that they thought people should, be able to teach their own children, how did it happen that this same county board voted 3-0 against Mrs. Andriolo?
In quoting the news story, I underlined the words “citing specific objectives”. They refer to a certain kind of meaningless school jargon - every teacher’s lesson plan is supposed to list “Objectives”. In many places, teachers are required to list both “Outcomes” and “Objectives”, and have to do verbal handsprings to make them sound different, since there is in fact no real difference. But the schools could use this clause as a way of penalizing parents for not using the approved private jargon. Of course, top rated private schools and colleges do not use this kind of jargon at all.
MORE LOCAL NEWS
For addresses of the organizations mentioned, see the Directory in GWS #30, or our “Home-Schooling Resource List” ($1). If you have a local newsletter, we’d really appreciate being on your mailing list; that way we can let the rest of our readers know what you’re doing.
CALIFORNIA: We list the San Juan Ridge Union School District in California as a “Friendly School District”. Its Independent Study Director, Marilyn DeVore, has just told us that although its mailing address is in Nevada City, the district is actually in North San Juan, 16 miles away. She writes, “Our Nevada City mailing address has presented some problems. A family reading your publication moved to Nevada City, only to find that the school district there does not offer Independent Study…”
Connie Warthan in San Jose writes, “In the Bay Area we have been meeting for almost a year now… It is an informal picnic and anybody interested in unschooling is welcome. Date is second Saturday of the month.”
CONNECTICUT: From Jennifer Lupinek: “As a result of a picnic held at the home of Madalene and Tom Murphy last summer, many families have gotten together and the Murphys are putting out a newsletter, Hearth Notes. Laura Pritchard and I have put together an information packet on home schooling in Connecticut, which contains the guidelines on home education from the state department, our letter to the supt., and extensive list of resources, and names of homeschoolers. We have to ask $2 for the packet to cover printing and mailing expenses…”
FLORIDA: Ann Mordes writes in the FLASH newsletter, 1/83: “I have received many telephone calls and letters from all over the state since October, from people who are complaining of harassment by truant officers. FLASH was happy to supply these many people with copies of our letters from the Governor’s office, and the Health and Rehabilitative Services letter which ‘let my husband and me off the hook’ here in Jackson County [GWS #28]. Indeed these letters have helped every home schooler who needed and used them.”
ILLINOIS: The Demmins sent us a report submitted to the State Board of Education, dated 6/24/82, called “Informational Report and Preliminary Recommendations Regarding the State’s Relationship to Illinois Nonpublic Schools”. It recommended that the State “add to the current list of assurances required for registration (i.e. immunization/health examination; health and fire safety; and academic term of 176 days or 880 clock hours; and nondiscriminatory policies) the following: that children are taught the branches of education also taught to children of corresponding ages and grades in the public schools…” Anyone knowing of the fate of these recommendations, please let us know.
KENTUCKY: According to some newspaper articles sent by Ruth McCutchen, the state Superintendent of Public Instruction told the local districts that they were responsible for bringing legal action against parents whose children attended unapproved schools, and officials in at least two districts have started truancy proceedings against families in Christian schools. However, the Rev. B.C. Gillespie has filed suit against the state board in U.S. District Court.
MASSACHUSETTS: Deborah Armer, writes, “Some of us here in the Falmouth area are now calling ourselves the CAPE COD HOMESCHOOLING COOPERATIVE. At last we have name for ourselves (and some discounts when we go places as a group)! We consist of eight families at the moment; six actually have their children out of school, the others are not yet of school age. We are beginning to get lots of phone calls from others in surrounding towns, as well… We have finished putting out our second monthly newsletter!”
MICHIGAN Dr. Raymond Moore, author of SCHOOL CAN WAIT, HOME-GROWN KIDS, etc., has started a newsletter, Family Report, for members of his HEWITT RESEARCH FOUNDATION (553 Tudor Rd, Berrien Springs, MI 49103).
OKLAHOMA: Toni O’Leary told us that the OKLAHOMA HOME-SCHOOLERS ASSOCIATION was to have its first meeting on Feb. 12.
PENNSYLVANIA: A story in the Fall ‘82 Pa. Unschoolers Network began with this quote by Wendell Phillips: “What is defeat? Nothing but education, nothing but the first step to something better,” and then went on to say: “This was borne out in the experiences of the Rattenni family in Canonsburg. Jean and Richard had applied to their local superintendent about homeschooling their two daughters. The reply was negative because of their lack of teaching certificate. Drawing deep gulps of faith, they set about collecting recommendations from local elementary faculty, regional overseer of their church, etc. Based on these, the superintendent REVERSED HIS DECISION…”
TEXAS: The TEXAS HOME EDUCATION COALITION is planning seminars on how to defend your own case in court, and is considering submitting a pro-home-schooling bill in the state legislature.
VERMONT: Jerry Mintz of the Shaker Mountain School has started a newsletter for the VERMONT ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION NETWORK. He says, “The woman who typed up the mailing list is about to start home-schooling her granddaughter when she takes her on a three-month trip down south.”
AUSTRALIAN NEWSLETTER
The Dec. 82 issue of Other Ways has much exciting news of alternative school and home school developments in that country. Not only is home schooling continuing to grow in the state of Victoria (where the city of Melbourne is located), but it is spreading to and growing in other states: New South Wales, Southern Australia, Queensland, Western Australia - which covers most of the country. Lorraine and Adrian Doesburg, with whom I had a very interesting long distance phone conversation a few months ago are the resource people for Western Australia.
Other Ways, which at first concerned itself mainly with doings in the state of Victoria, seems to have become the Australian national newsletter of alternative and home schooling - at least, I don’t know of any other. Any who are interested in the growth of home schooling in Australia, and certainly any who think they might be visiting or moving there in the near future, should subscribe. Also, it may be a good way for children to make some Australian pen pals. - JH
LEGAL INSURANCE WORKING
[DR:] In January 1981, Ed Nagel and the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE LEGAL SUPPORT OF ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS started an insurance program for home-schooling families concerned about facing legal action. We asked how it was going, and Lu Vorys wrote on Ed’s behalf:
…Ed feels the Legal Insurance For Education (LIFE) program is working very well as a protection for home study families from intimidation and/or prosecution. Of the 52 families who have taken out policies, only two have made claims, In most cases, strong letters from Ed to threatening school officials have averted legal action.
The rates are the same as originally explained ion Tidbits #8: $80 a year for up to $20,000 coverage, $40 a year for up to $10,000 coverage, and $20 a year up to $5,0900…
MORE NEWS FROM CARVER
From Pat Montgomery (MI):
…I thought you might like to know that Norman Bossio, superintendent of Carver Schools in Carver, Massachusetts, is very supportive of home schooling. In the last two years he has gone before his board four times and recommended that families in his district do home schooling, and specifically, Clonlara’s Home Based Education Program. He called the other day regarding one of the families and was lavish in his praise of our program.
He was also seriously concerned about another family in his district who were not following any program and were apparently feeding him mis-information about their home schooling. He seemed genuinely disturbed by this in view of the fact that he is known to support home schooling.
You will probably recall [GWS #21] that Carver is the place where, two or three years ago, a judge ordered a family of a frequently-absent-from-school teenager to enroll in Clonlara’s program and he also ordered the school district to pay the bill…
COMMISSION FOR ADS
As you can see, our campaign to get display and classified advertising in GWS is off to a good start. Many thanks to all of you who bought these ads. In order to make GWS as close as possible to self-supporting, and less dependent than it is on the very uncertain and declining lecture business, we want to increase this advertising as fast as we can; our target, which we hope to reach in a year or two, is four pages of ads in each issue, which by that time would be 28 and more probably 32 pages.
We plan to solicit ads actively from this office; Pat Farenga will be our Director of Advertising. But because we are small and already very busy, we will only be able to do a limited amount of this. What we would like is to have as many readers as possible solicit ads for us, from any businesses they may know of or read about that they think might like to advertise in GWS. To encourage you, we make this offer: for every display ad that you recruit for us (from someone else, of course - an ad for yourself wouldn’t count), and send in together with the check in payment, we will pay you a commission of 10% of the cost of the ad.
The only other thing I would like to say about our advertising is that it would be very helpful if whenever you buy anything advertised here, you mention to the company that you saw their ad in GWS - perhaps writing them a letter, perhaps just making a little note on the order blank.
For any help you can give us in either of these ways, thanks very much. - JH